I’ve avoided posting all week because I knew I’d end up writing about the playoffs. And judging from what I see around the internet there seem to be three, and only three, perspectives that one can take on the matter, none of which are particularly seemly.
First, you can be a good MLS soldier, ready and able to rise to the defense of the playoffs as they currently exist. These are the people who use terms like “chess match” to describe the tedious and under-attended 0-0 draws we saw last weekend.
Second, you can strap a single-table cross on your back and walk through the streets of Major League Soccer preaching against playoff heresy and bewailing the reward the Earthquakes and the Revolution received for seasons well-played: playing from behind in a must win game.
Third, you can engage in the MLS equivalent of fan-fiction and concoct all manner of elaborate alternative playoff schemes that are both better than what MLS offers and without any hope of practical realization.
I don’t care to associate myself with any of these perspectives.
The good soldiers blithely discount the fact that problems do exist. To name two, with notable exceptions, many MLS playoff games are lousy and suffer from poor attendance. (Of course, some of the poor attendance is the fault of an MLS marketing strategy that seems to concentrate on the idea that MLS games are “events” to which to take your “group,” at the expense of building a devoted fan base that shows up no matter what. But that’s a discussion for another time.)
The single-table preachers are annoying because they have a point. The current system does not adequately reward teams that do well in the regular season. But the purported universal righteousness of a single table is not gospel truth, and in their preaching (or is it kvetching) they ignore the variety of impracticalities and problems that a single table would pose for MLS.
The fan-fiction folks are simply utopian. They are more interesting than the alternative types, but they suffer from the idealistic notion that every problem MLS faces meets its solution with one or another structural change. If only they’d change the playoff format, if only they’d change the roster rules, if only, if only, if only … then all would be better. It wouldn’t.
As far as I’m concerned the playoffs are what they are and when MLS grows to 18 teams they’ll be more interesting and exciting. When fewer than half the teams in the league make the playoffs the post-season will more readily guarantee high quality games between high quality teams.
But that improvement will come at a price. With 18 teams the bottom of the table affairs in the second half of the regular season won’t be very compelling. If you think today’s single-table preachers are bad, just wait until the promotion and relegation preachers experience those doldrums.